#becauseItDepends Finding your inner Vulcan: unemotional decision making with pattern-style thinking

This can be especially useful for businesses with small teams and/or limited budgets. Unlike monolithic applications, microservices keep each block of code separate, even after deployment. You only need a single point of entry to access server-side applications, so all modules don’t have to be tethered to one server. Besides, DevOps practices are incorporated in microservices development in azure to build faster at a reduced cost.

Finally, we automated as much as we could, including the migration process itself. We created our own dashboard to view all migrations effectively in real time. Highly maintainable and testable – Teams can experiment with new features and roll back if something doesn’t work. This makes it easier to update code and accelerates time-to-market for new features. Plus, it is easy to isolate and fix faults and bugs in individual services.

Why monolithic architecture is better than microservices

Because of its complexity, microservices architecture will require more time and developers to build applications than it takes to build monolithic applications. Monolithic application is scaled as a whole, unlike microservices that can be scaled unevenly, saving business and development teams a lot of time and resources. This is a younger technology, but during the seven years of its presence on the market, it has done much to revolutionize app creation endeavors. The major difference between monolithic and microservices architecture is that the latter contains a collection of independent modules that run every process as a separate service.

Step 1. Identify the context

The microservices act independently, and thus users do not require knowledge of only one language to create an application. This architecture allows for different languages in various releases. Here is a breakdown of monolithic vs microservices architectures to better understand the one that suits your organization. Monolithic and microservices are popular and powerful software architectures used by most if not all software engineers today. The debate on functionality and efficiency continues to linger between the two. While some businesses are adopting the new microservices architecture, others still maintain the older counterpart, monolithic.

Why monolithic architecture is better than microservices

Let’s learn more about the microservices-based solution designed by our team. Apps built for industries like healthcare or finances should maintain 100% uptime and store data securely. With the help of the microservice architecture, developers can create highly-resilient and secure apps. Even when one or more microservices are down, the entire application can keep working, providing access to the rest of the functionality. For example, Mr. A is working on a multifaceted application with his team that is spread across geographical boundaries.

It’s impossible to make a blanket formula to determine whether one of these frameworks is best for every business within a certain category. It’s like asking, when does a business go from being a startup to being an SME? And when does an SME graduate into the level of enterprise? ASICS chooses Contentstack to modernize and accelerate global online experience … Build the tech stack that you’ve always dreamed of, on your terms. Some companies were forced to review their operations, while others had to solve tasks they had never faced before.

Business transactions that affect numerous services must also affect each of the services’ databases. Because each service is entirely separate from the others in the app, it can only communicate via HTTP requests or specific APIs. Because microservices communicate with one another via remote calls, network latency also increases. When you opt for a microservices architecture, developers have the advantage of using multiple tools, languages, frameworks, and OS to build enterprise applications for business.

Data-Heavy Applications

It’s important to weigh the pros and cons carefully and make an informed decision that best meets the needs of your application, team, and infrastructure. A microservices architecture is an approach to software development where an application is broken down into smaller, independent services that communicate with each other through APIs. This approach allows for greater flexibility, scalability, and resilience. If your business idea is fresh and you want to validate it, you should start with a monolith. With a small engineering team aiming to develop a simple and lightweight application, there is no need to implement microservices.

Why monolithic architecture is better than microservices

And finally, the tech-agnostic approach allows teams to update components, migrate to new frameworks and try new technologies within one service without costly large-scale refactoring. In conclusion, we’ve explored a step-by-step process to transform a legacy monolithic Telecom CRM application into a modern, cloud-native architecture with using ChatGPT-4. On any given day, the entire application can go down due to issues in the application. This is the major disadvantage of using monolithic applications. Should a single microservice go down, it would not take down the entire application. The microservice architecture enables developers to connect a lot of services developed using different technologies.

The tradeoffs of microservices architecture vs monolithic architecture

I provide consulting and training that can accelerate and derisk your adoption of microservices. If you are not using patterns, you need to devise your own. These are often various non-functional requirements (or -ilities), including maintainability, scalability, etc.

Why monolithic architecture is better than microservices

Imagine, for example, that you’re running a social media platform. Any social media platform application does a lot of different things. It handles user registrations and logins and publishing, editing, and removal of posts. It will probably need a recommendation engine, it likely handles private messages between users, and so on. With a traditional architecture, what we now call a “monolith,” you’d have all these different things packaged into one. All these separate responsibilities can be grouped into logical pieces and packaged separately as microservices.


Industry Recognition The recognition of N-iX by industry leaders validates our commitment to innovation and the high quality of technological expertise. It is also important that by choosing a monolithic system, we condemn ourselves to one supplier — hardly anyone will take over such a system and take care of its maintenance or reconstruction. Technology companies then suggest switching to a new system or possibly refactoring. This is because when the monolithic system is to “hit” new hands, it is usually the legacy system . Steve Jones, MDM at Capgemini once said, “Microservices is SOA, for those who know what SOA is”.

  • A monolithic application, on the other hand, has a single database.
  • From new Spring releases to active JUGs, the Java platform is …
  • Finally, we automated as much as we could, including the migration process itself.
  • Whether you’ve decided to stick to monolith architecture or pursue with microservices, our engineers will help you build need-based and robust custom software.
  • Additionally, we will compare how SAP leverages these same patterns to address the same scalability issues.
  • This distributed architecture adds to the high reliability, scalability, and portability of the overall application.

The microservices architecture is a modern approach to software development that is integrated with independently deployable services. A large program is split into separate Docker containers that have self-reliant services that communicate via APIs. Most importantly, the microservices architecture relies on business-oriented APIs that combine everything into a cohesive application. This gives them a higher level of modularity than a monolithic architecture. Whether you’ve decided to stick to monolith architecture or pursue with microservices, our engineers will help you build need-based and robust custom software.

Microservices vs. monolithic architecture: A comprehensive guide

Although it is easy to create a single service, this framework poses challenges. It is hard to sync the application due to the different languages, databases and even libraries used. Therefore, it is not possible to tell that the data is in sync. The monolithic architecture may be challenging for beginners. Not only is it huge, but it isn’t easy to modify the application.

Moving ahead, while it seems difficult to choose the best-suited architecture for your business bottom line, we have curated a list of factors that you may want to concentrate on. The database stores, receives, and processes all the incoming and outgoing data. The server-side application performs back-end operations like handling HTTP requests and retrieving information from the database. Microservices are costly in terms of network usage as they need to interact with each other and all these remote calls result in network latency. Services that are developed discretely enable developers to use the appropriate development framework for the task at hand. Latency and lag time plague web applications that run JavaScript in the browser.

“Breaking Down the Pros and Cons of Microservices vs Monoliths”

First, you can use different programming languages for different purposes. For example, if your application is written in Java but you want to add some machine-learning capabilities, it’s best to monolith vs microservices pros and cons use Python. If you’re struggling to hire people who know your application’s language, you can simply hire engineers who know a more common language and create new microservices in that language.

Monoliths don’t necessarily limit businesses in terms of features. You can build any feature you like with enough time and resources. They limit the way that brands can interact with customers and offer more modern experiences.

For example, if you change anything in the Driver Management microservice, you just need to build and deploy the Driver Management microservice and not touch the others. ✔ An API Gateway was introduced to connect all the drivers to the passengers. The API Gateway internally connects all the microservices such as Passenger Management, Driver Management, Trip management, etc., through REST API calls.

Leave a Comment